Home arrow Commentary arrow Default Category arrow Ron Paul defends positions on 'Meet the Press'
Dec 26 2007
Ron Paul defends positions on 'Meet the Press' | Print |  E-mail
By Shahram Vahdany   

By Cliff Boyer

In what was at times a heated exchange, Ron Paul defended his libertarian positions Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Moderator Tim Russert focused on the amount of money Paul's Texas district receives in federal funding. His district has been among the top in Texas in receiving federal assistance since 2000. In the first nine months of the 2006 fiscal year, his district received $4 billion in aid.

Paul voted against the bailout for Hurricane Katrina victims, yet as Russert pointed out, most of the money Paul's district receives is for flood control aid. Paul himself sponsored 10 earmarks for his district in the water resources bill that was passed over President George Bush's veto.

"You're confused," Paul told Russert. "You've got it all mixed up. The whole process is corrupt -- it's the system. I'm trying to change the system."

Paul has touted cuts in taxes and spending but he seems to differ from his fellow Republicans who usually prioritize cuts in domestic spending and entitlements. Paul instead would start with foreign policy and advocates closing military bases in Europe and Asia and bringing troops home.
"If you brought our troops home we'd save hundreds of millions of dollars," Paul said.

Paul advocates cutting the size of the federal government as well, including eliminating the Department of Education. He says the goal is "to cut spending and reduce government to a constitutional size."

He wants to make all medical expenses tax deductible and to give doctors the freedom to collectively negotiate with insurance companies to drive down the cost of medical care.

Immigration is a hot-button issue for many Republicans and Paul is in step with many of the major proposals put forth by the presidential candidates. He wants to secure the borders and to enforce visa rules and regulations. He is against "amnesty" and wants "true immigration reform."

Paul calls for the decriminalization of drugs and calls the war on drugs "absurd." He thinks the focus on drugs is too expensive and one more instance of government interference in private lives.

"We're not moving toward a Hitler-type fascism, but we're moving toward a softer fascism," Paul said. "Loss of civil liberties, corporations running the show, big government in bed with big business."

Paul has said that he has no intention of running as an Independent if he doesn't receive the Republican nomination.

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 8285

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 26-12-2007 15:50
The earmarks are not that hard to understand. Bills are submitted with an appropriation of tax money to fund the bill.  
 
Earmarks are used to direct some of the appropriation to specific projects.  
 
If Ron Paul did not place earmarks, the money would simply be used as earmarks by other congressmen. Placing earmarks DOES NOT REDUCE SPENDING. Ron Paul uses earmarks to direct money back to his district- that is his job. That he does not vote to authorize the VAST MAJORITY of these bills is rarely mentioned.  
 
He doesn't even vote for his own earmarks!
Guest
scriven.taylor@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Scriven Taylor
2. 26-12-2007 17:33
Correction for the quote "If you brought our troops home we'd save hundreds of millions of dollars" 
 
hundreds of *billions* of dollars
Guest
Tim
3. 26-12-2007 17:36
Trying to operate under a corrupt govern
In order to have funding for important public services like water and road infrastructure our elected officials must operate under a corrupt governmental system.  
 
When someone with experience from within this system wants to do something to change it, he or she is characterized as some sort of hypocrite. 
 
So someone from the outside is discredited for lack of experience and someone from the inside is discredited because of it. What is a fed up citizenry to do I wonder?
Guest
Travis
4. 26-12-2007 17:37
Re=Tim
Quote:
 
hundreds of *billions* of dollars

 
 
Maybe the writer got it wrong
Guest
Shahram
5. 26-12-2007 23:29
saradinicola
Travis had a great point...why do we put up with a corrupt system that makes us send an Intolerable Tax to the Federal Govt., then beg & grovel to get SOME of it back to the State level?.....I'm so sick of writers expounding upon ONE side of something, when they actually understand BOTH sides. That is not honest. To imply that Ron Paul is not honest, in that context, is a lie. -Sara DiNicola- 56-year old who's NEVER seen every country in Europe, plus Venezuela, Australia, and Canada have campaign groups for a U.S. Presidential candidate.
Guest
sara_tiffin@yahoo.comNOSPAM! ">Sara DiNicola

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4

 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: