Translation
Choose Decision!
by Benjamin Tripp
Americans love choices, but they hate decisions. In some ways this is at the root of our current national dilemma. We have a choice of airlines, shopping malls, grocery stores, and political parties. But to avoid having to make decisions about them, dangerous factors come into play: first, the choices appear almost identical. At least on the superficial, instinctive plane where important decisions get made, they're more or less the same. Second, we forget there are other options not immediately apparent-- instead just shrugging and buying into the offered paradigm, whether it works or not.
Ford or Chevy? Honda or Toyota? The differences at the level of our interaction with these vehicles are slim. They all have the same arrangement of pedals and controls, they all have the same configuration of windows, seats, engines and so forth. We don't buy a vehicle based on the labor practices of its corporate maker, the factory's environmental record, or its marketing practices in the developing world. We buy it because it's painted red. Or because dad had one just like it back in the '60s. Democrat or Republican? Same general malaise. Dad was a Republican, so you're a Republican. After all, Democrats are barely distinguishable from Republicans: they all swill corporate money from the same trough, they're all liars, and they're all hollow, empty little people living on the public dime. It's only when you get below the superficial that you discover Republicans are demonstrably evil, while Democrats are merely disgusting. And beyond that, we could even go for a third party. Who knew?
So in fact our choices are not identical, they just appear to be identical. They've been dumbed-down. Why is that? If Southwest Airlines has far and away the best employee benefits package, one would imagine this might give them an edge, but it doesn't. The only factor is price. Delta's shoddy maintenance of its aircraft is legendary among pilots. Does the consumer give a damn? Not really, if Delta has the best deal on a ticket to St. Louis. United and American are understaffed, on the edge of bankruptcy, and the planes are falling apart. I usually fly United because that's where the most frequent flyer miles accumulate, even at the risk of plummeting out of the sky on a pillar of burning jet fuel. Why? Because in a superficial way, all the airlines seem more or less the same. I make a choice because it's easier than making a decision.
What's the difference? I'm parsing words, so I'd better define them. I'm using the word 'choice' in the sense of picking from among a group of like things, as choosing an orange from a bin full of oranges, or a Schwarzenegger movie instead of a Willis or a Stallone movie, for example. One way or another, you're going to end up with a bad action movie and an orange, regardless of your particular choice. By 'decision', on the other hand, I mean deciding if you want an apple, an orange, a carrot, or some lingonberries. Do you want an animated dinosaur musical, a 1980's office comedy, or a Japanese arterial spray movie (I recommend 'Ichi The Killer')? These are decisions. Maybe you don't want a movie at all, maybe you want to listen to music. Decisions. Any ex-advertising guy, such as myself, will tell you that the key to unlocking consumer's wallets is providing them with a wealth of identical choices. The minute they have to make a decision, the money doesn't get spent, because Americans have an incredibly hard time making up their tiny minds.
Religion benefits disproportionately from this quirk of the American psyche. Everybody stays with whatever church they grew up in, no matter how ridiculous the premise of that faith is. But --and this is what I was driving at, all this time, thanks for sticking with me-- being Americans, they pick and choose which bits of the religion they believe in. It doesn't work that way, not in reality. The entire agenda of the church moves forward, bolstered up by millions of semi-believers that more or less just go along to get along. A friend of mine related it to acupuncture.
Lots of people believe acupuncture works, and I'm told aspects of the treatment are effective. Perfectly reasonable people attend acupuncturists. Ask them if they believe in energy flows of various kinds called 'chi' shifting around the body that can be diverted and redirected by the application of needles, they will tend to try to redefine that as nervous energy, or electricity; this is a redefinition of acupuncture that puts it in modern terms. Right? Wrong. Acupuncture is very explicitly about chi energy, and its details were set down during the Bronze Age in China. You can't pick and choose. Acupuncture is what it is, and rationalizing it doesn't work. You've turned a decision --do I believe that the body contains an ethereal form of energy called chi, which is not electricity-- and made it into a choice, which is 'acupuncture has some good things about it'. We have a strong tendency as a nation to want to split absolutes into bite-sized morsels, then choose the morsels we like.
My point is not about the efficacy of acupuncture, but rather that people take the parts they like, leave the parts they don't agree with, and yet support the whole thing in such a way that the good and bad parts all get promoted equally. They do the same thing with politics. Many Republicans will say they are 'fiscal' or 'social' conservatives, and yet they support the entire agenda even though they abhor certain aspects of the party line. If you believe there should be no taxes on corporations, you must also support anti-choice legislation against women, regardless of your stance on the issue. You've made a choice (no taxes for corporations), but not a decision (the greater good of women trumps my tax position). The difference is important. A choice is picking between A or B, the options presented to you. A decision is understanding that A or B may not be the entire range of options, and that a more complex, self-guided solution may be required.
Translation
Thus it is with religion. People say, "there are many good lessons in the Bible, but I do not believe the world was created in a week, 6500 years ago". Then they go to church, their minds perfectly at ease with picking and choosing the parts of their religion they believe in. But that's not how it works. You either believe Jesus Christ walked on water and that he's coming back to end the world, and there is a hell and a heaven, pitchforks, angels, and all, or you are not a Christian. It's in the Bible, folks: you believe every word of it, or you go to hell for all eternity.
If we as a nation don't start showing the gumption to make hard decisions, we are lost. We choose little pieces of things we like, such as choosing a Toyota because it gets better gas mileage, but we do not make the real decisions, like to use public transportation because it is better for the ecosphere although it's a pain in the ass. We choose a brand of car, we don't decide to change the paradigm and give up cars altogether. We choose our favorite brand of religion like it was a cigarette, choosing to be Born Again or Mormon or Unitarian, but we don't decide that Abrahamaic religions have caused more misery than all the medieval plagues combined, with fewer tangible results, so it's time to give up Yaweh and go Hindu. Or give up religion entirely.
Life is not binary, I know. Some aspects of acupuncture do work, just as there are some comforts that arise from religiosity or being a Republican. There are shades of gray. But it is incumbent upon us all to start doing the cost/benefit analysis. If acupuncture doesn't cause any harm, and it does occasionally provide relief, go ahead and support the practice. Just understand that in so supporting, you are supporting the entire edifice of acupuncture, including all the 4,000-year-old pre-medicinal voodoo that comes with it. You don't get to choose what acupuncture includes, you only get to choose to participate in it or not. In that way, life is binary.
If you choose to be a Republican, do the math. Are the specific issues of concern to you more important than the impact that other aspects of the Republican faith has on the rest of the world? Is your boss's tax cut more important than your daughter's personal freedom? If you can honestly say that the benefits outweigh the costs, go ahead and be Republican. But do NOT imagine there's any shade of gray in it. You go Republican, you support the entire ball of whacks --a Christian government, secret torture prisons, racist policies, anti-environmental and pro-corporate agendas. Not just the narrow issue you choose is important.
So life isn't binary, sure. But human marketing systems always funnel life into a binary mode. Orange 1 or orange 2, if they're selling oranges. Look beyond the choices with which you are being presented, and make some decisions. Episcopalian or Seventh-Day Adventist? I decided religion was a disaster, so I chose to be ethical instead of religious. I could decide internal combustion is an insupportable option for transport and choose to ride a horse instead. Decisions make for better choices. So decide to become a decider, not just a chooser, and do it quickly, because the range of decisions we are empowered to make is getting narrower all the time. And the choices just keep getting worse.
Quote this article on your site | Views: 1990Be first to comment this article |  |
|
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4
Tags: Ben Tripp Choose Decision!