Oct 08 2007
Torture Endorsed, Torture Denied
Editorial
By Marjorie Cohn   

Translation

Torture Endorsed, Torture Denied

ImageThe April 2004 publication of grotesque photographs of naked Iraqis piled on top of each other, forced to masturbate, and led around on leashes like dogs, sent shock waves around the world. George W. Bush declared, “I shared a deep disgust that those prisoners were treated the way they were treated.” Yet less than a year later, his Justice Department issued a secret opinion endorsing the harshest techniques the CIA has ever used, according to a report in the New York Times. These include head slapping, frigid temperatures, and water boarding, in which the subject is made to feel he is drowning. Water boarding is widely considered a torture technique. Once again, Bush is compelled to issue a denial. “This government does not torture people,” he insisted.

This was not the first time the Bush administration had officially endorsed torture, however. John Yoo, writing for the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, penned an August 2002 memorandum that rewrote the legal definition of torture to require the equivalent of organ failure. This memo violated the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, a treaty the United States ratified, and therefore part of U.S. law under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.



In December 2002, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld approved interrogation methods that included the use of dogs, hooding, stress positions, isolation for up to 30 days, 20-hour interrogations, deprivation of light and sound, and water boarding. U.S. Navy General Counsel Alberto Mora told William Haynes, the Pentagon’s general counsel, that Rumsfeld’s “authorized interrogation techniques could rise to the level of torture.” As a result, Rumsfeld rescinded some methods but reserved the right to approve others, including water boarding, on a case-by-case basis.

When Bush maintained last week that his government doesn’t torture prisoners, he stressed the necessity of interrogation to “protect the American people.” Notwithstanding the myth perpetuated by shows like “24,” however, torture doesn’t work. Experts agree that people who are tortured will say anything to make the torture stop.

One of the first victims of the Bush administration’s 2002 torture policy was Abu Zubaydah, whom they called “chief of operations” for al Qaeda and bin Laden’s “number three man.” He was repeatedly tortured at the secret CIA “black sites.” They water boarded him, withheld his medication, threatened him with impending death, and bombarded him with continuous deafening noise and harsh lights.

But Zubaydah wasn’t a top al Qaeda leader. Dan Coleman, one of the FBI's leading experts on al Qaeda, said of Zubaydah, "He knew very little about real operations, or strategy … He was expendable, you know, the greeter . . . Joe Louis in the lobby of Caeser's Palace, shaking hands." Moreover, Zubaydah was schizophrenic; according to Coleman, “This guy is insane, certifiable split personality.” Coleman's views were echoed at the top levels of the CIA and were communicated to Bush and Cheney. But Bush scolded CIA director George Tenet, saying, "I said [Zubaydah] was important. You're not going to let me lose face on this, are you?" Zubaydah's minor role in al Qaeda and his apparent insanity were kept secret.

"Bush’s insistence that his administration doesn't torture rings hollow. He lied about weapons of mass destruction and a Saddam-al Qaeda connection in Iraq. He lied when he assured us his officials would not wiretap without warrants. As evidence of secret memos detailing harsh interrogation policies continues to emerge, we can't believe Bush's denials about torture."

In response to the torture, Zubaydah told his interrogators about myriad terrorist targets al Qaeda had in its sights: the Brooklyn Bridge, the Statute of Liberty, shopping malls, banks, supermarkets, water systems, nuclear plants, and apartment buildings. Al Qaeda was close to building a crude nuclear bomb, Zubaydah reported. None of this was corroborated but the Bush gang reacted to each report zealously.

Moreover, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, considered the mastermind of the September 11 attacks, was tortured so severely – including by water boarding – that the information he provided is virtually worthless. A potentially rich source of intelligence was lost as a result of the torture.

Bush’s insistence that his administration doesn't torture rings hollow. He lied about weapons of mass destruction and a Saddam-al Qaeda connection in Iraq. He lied when he assured us his officials would not wiretap without warrants. As evidence of secret memos detailing harsh interrogation policies continues to emerge, we can't believe Bush's denials about torture.

Democrats in Congress have demanded they be allowed to see the memos, but Bush said the interrogation methods have been "fully disclosed to appropriate members of Congress." Senator John D. Rockefeller IV was unmoved. "I'm tired of these games," he said. "They can't say that Congress has been fully briefed while refusing to turn over key documents used to justify the legality of the program."

It is incumbent upon the Senate Judiciary Committee to vigorously interrogate Michael Mukasey during his attorney general confirmation hearing. As AG, Mukasey would oversee the department that writes interrogation policy. Mukasey should know that the Convention Against Torture prohibits torture in all circumstances, even in times of war.

Torture is a war crime. Those who commit or order torture can be convicted under the U.S. War Crimes Statute. Techniques that don't rise to the level of torture but constitute cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment also violate U.S. law. Congress should provide for the appointment of a special independent counsel to fully investigate and prosecute all who are complicit in the torture of prisoners in U.S. custody.

Marjorie Cohn,  MWC News Magazine senior editor, is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and the President of the National Lawyers Guild. Her new book, Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent (with Kathleen Gilberd), will be published this winter by PoliPointPress. Her articles are archived at www.marjoriecohn.com.
Other articles by this author

This article was first published by JURIST

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1863

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 08-10-2007 22:01
The one thing this world knows, except for the American 30%ers, is that to find out what the Neo-cons are doing in the world take each speech Bush gives and turn it to it's exact opposite. This actually works like a charm. Thanks Marjorie Cohn for another essential article.
Guest
2. 12-10-2007 03:41
Perhaps of all the \"... -in-Chief\" titles that Bush has bestowed on his person/office, that of Protector-in-Chief rings most hallow, yet proves to be most hollow. Thanks for your continued effort in exposing an incredible villainous administration.
Guest
ben@tanosborn.comNOSPAM! ">Ben Tanosborn
3. 12-10-2007 06:47
Zero tolerance for torturers
The Bush Adninistration and its Bush-ite allies are complicit in torture, no ifs or buts.  
 
No wonder outstanding Hungarian Jewsish American investor, philanthropist, Holocaust hero and Holocaust survivor George Soros has called for the "de-Nazification" of Bush America (see "Bush America needs de-Nazification" on MWC News via the link below). 
 
Members of MY family have suffered torture that is mirroed in CURRENT American practices applied to AUSTRALIANS with the connivance of the Bush-ite Australian Government. Thus I only recently learned how a close relative, an eminent medical doctor, was savagely beaten in custody before being finally killed by the Nazis in Budapest, Hungary in October 1944 (Australian Mamdou Habib was horrendously tortured after US rendition to Egypt but fortunately survived and was eventually released because he was utterly innocent).  
 
In 1949 my grandmother's cousin, medical doctor Dr Edith Bone, was imprisoned by the Stalinist Hungarian Communist authorities and spent 7 years in solitary confinement in appalling conidtions - she was liberated in 1956 and wrote a book called "Seven Years Solitary" about her extraordinary mental and physical survival (Australian David Hicks was raped, and then transported and held in horribly abusive conditions, much of it in solitary confinement, in Guantanamo Bay - but was finally released to be allowed to serve about a year in prison in Bush-ite Australia shortly after the Anglican Cathedral in the Centre of Melbourne posted a huge sign saying "Bring David Home"). 
 
Lesson: history ignored yields history repeated. There must be zero tolerance for torture and those complicit in torture like Bush and his evil Bush-ite allies around the world.
Guest
gpolya@optusnet.com.auNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
4. 12-10-2007 13:17
Hicks solitary was torture
Extensive solitary confinement, routinely used by the Bush Administration and its criminal collaborators around the world is a form of torture.  
 
Australian David Hicks was subject to extensive solitary confinement during his over 5 years (FIVE YEARS) of incarceration at Guantanamo Bay - he was eventually released (after big pressure from ordinary Australians) by the device of a "plea bargain" to permit him to serve a year in an "ordinary" prison in South Australia.  
 
According to the cowardly, war criminal, torture-complicit Bush-ite Australian Government Hicks broke NO Australian laws.  
 
The Bush Administration has violated international law by illegal, abusive imprisonment and torture and by charging Hicks with RETROSPECTIVE offences (a war crime in itself).
Guest
gpolya@optusnet.com.auNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
5. 13-10-2007 08:16
Re-naming.
The US is big on re-naming things as if somehow it changes them, I suppose its good old spin. Collateral damage = The destruction of none targets and the murder of innocents as a by product in the attempt to obtain a military objective. 
Rendering = Torture.  
Forceful interrogation = Torture. 
When one looks back at history, 
and reviews all the barbaric torture that was carried out, where women for instance, owned up to copulating with Satan under torture, knowing that to do so was certain death, anything to escape the torture!  
The CIA and any administration who condones torture under any name, are comrades to those dark monsters of past ages. There is no escaping that fact. 
 
Mike
Registered

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Marjorie Cohn George W. Bush Torture Donald Rumsfeld