| Both Obama and Clinton Miss the Point on Iraq |
| Political Views | ||||||||
| By MWC News | ||||||||
|
Both Obama and Clinton Miss the Point on Iraq Throughout the race for the Democratic Party presidential nomination, Barack Obama has taken Hillary Clinton to task for her 2002 vote authorizing President Bush to attack Iraq. Obama says that Clinton’s vote reflected poor judgment on her part. Clinton has claimed that when she voted in favor of the authorization, she never imagined that President Bush would actually use it go to war. She thought it was only going to be used for negotiating purposes to encourage Saddam Hussein to “disarm.” Both Obama and Clinton miss the real point, however—the Constitution, and specifically that portion of the Constitution relating to the powers to declare war and wage war. We should remind ourselves, first and foremost, what the Constitution actually is. The Constitution is a set of rules that the American citizenry have imposed on the federal government (and the state governments). Just as federal officials impose laws on us, we have imposed a law on them, which is the Constitution. Just as we are expected to obey their laws, they are expected to obey our law. In addition to setting up the federal government, the Constitution establishes the powers that can be exercised by each of the three branches of government. The Constitution enumerates the powers for each branch. If a power isn’t enumerated, then it cannot legally be exercised. By the same token, a power delegated to one branch of government cannot be delegated to another branch of government. The power belongs only to the branch of government to which it has been delegated in the Constitution. With respect to war, the Constitution delegates to the president the power to wage war. However, it delegates to Congress the power to declare war. What’s the difference between these two powers? The power to declare war is the power to decide whether to go to war or not. Under the Constitution, the president cannot legally wage war against another nation unless Congress first declares war. Again, that’s the law of the land — the law that the American people have imposed on the president, the Congress, the judiciary, and all of their subordinates. Why did the Framers divide the power to declare war and the power to wage war? Because they didn’t want the president making the decision to go to war. They knew that throughout history rulers have gone to war for the stupidest of reasons, including pride and hubris, and thus they wanted the decision to be made by Congress, the elected body of representatives of the people. The Iraq War is a perfect example of what the Framers were trying to protect us from. In the build-up to the 2002 invasion, President Bush scared the American people half to death with the prospect that Saddam Hussein was about to unleash WMDs on the United States. “Saddam must disarm!” he repeatedly cried. Alternatively, he argued, the United States should go to war in order to spread democracy in the Middle East. Alternatively, he suggested, there was an al-Qaeda-Saddam link. As Americans are slowly discovering, all of the president’s rationales for going to war have turned out to be bogus. Hillary Clinton, along with many Americans, argued the importance of placing our faith and trust in the president. “He knows best. He’s got information that we’re not privy to. He would never lie to us.” Those who made such an argument forgot one important thing: the Constitution, and specifically the part dealing with declaring war. Under the law, President Bush’s judgment on invading Iraq was quite irrelevant, except as a factor that Congress could have taken into consideration in deciding whether to declare war on Iraq. The law required President Bush to go to Congress and request a declaration of war against Iraq. When Congress convened, the president would have had ample opportunity to make his case for declaring war on Iraq. By the same token, the members of Congress would have had ample opportunity to show that the president’s reasons for going to war were bogus and that all he wanted to do was to effect a regime change in Iraq. Would Congress have declared war after hearing the president make his case for war? It is impossible to know, but it is entirely possible that the president’s case for going to war might have collapsed like a house of cards under close scrutiny by a few conscientious members of Congress. What we do know is that by declaring war himself, President Bush violated the law — the supreme law of the land that the American people have imposed on him. But Clinton and the other members of Congress also violated the Constitution as well as and the trust that Americans have place in them as members of Congress. With their vote authorizing the president to decide whether go to war, they essentially said, “Mr. President. We know that it’s our responsibility under the Constitution to decide whether to declare war. But that’s going to be a tough call, especially in an election year. We want you to make the decision. Therefore, we are authorizing you to decide whether the nation is going to war against Iraq.” Yet, under the Constitution the Congress is precluded from delegating its power to declare war to the president. Therefore, the congressional vote authorizing President Bush to make such a determination was illegal under our form of government. (By the way, it was also quite cowardly.) Obama’s beef is that the president exercised bad judgment in going to war on Iraq. Clinton’s response is that she didn’t realize that the president would exercise bad judgment after she authorized him to exercise his judgment. What neither of them get is that under our system of government, the issue of going to war against Iraq does not depend on the judgment of the president but rather on the judgment of Congress. This is where Obama, Clinton, McCain, and other members of Congress failed America. Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.
Quote this article on your site | Views: 1286
1. 19-03-2008 21:04 :cry I guess it\'s just betond the childlike trust America places in it\'s government for them to actually really question \'WHY\' all these Muslim Terror things have been rolling-on & on & on ever since the Lebanese Suicide Bombings (Murders) of the reasonably innocents Marines there just doing their patriotic service... Honestly America... You really do treat your government with the same amount of naivety that children do when they want prezzies from Santa Claus... Most kids know it\'s a rort but they just play along to get that new bike or doll or whatever... Most kids are actually smarter than that but they just deliberately suspend disbelief for the apparent advantage it brings... But what possible advantage will it bring you to continue refusing to see the hand of the WW2-Financiers pulling very unconstitutional strings in your nation almost every day...? Look... In the mid-eighties CIA was tasked by the Whitehouse to silently assassinate the Saudi-Born \"OSAMA BIN-LADEN\" because he-was too staunch & just didn\'t want to \'PLAY BALL\' in the bigger-picture that you can see continually develop now with this next move on Iran designed to keep you all that stressed shocked-out & almost spiritually & emotionally punch drunk to ever look real close at the true \'AWFUL TRUTH\'... \"OSAMA\" is dead America...! Has-been since late 85 or early 86....! Wake-up to yourselves....! The original was being totally uncooperative with these \'WW2-Financiers\' (Financed both-sides & went-on to do exactly the same damn tactic under the Cold-War too...) Have you lost the heart will & courage to really question the lies you\'re constantly being fed...? America...? That\'s sad if you have but I-can easily understand how that can happen... What I-just can\'t understand is then lying about-it... That\'s literally bequeathing a Snake-Eys \'CATCH-22\' to the children we are supposed to be caring & providing for... It is shame... Have you lost your guts America...? Look! I-very strongly urge you to begin using your independent minds to begin seeing \"PETER WILLIAM VANSTONE\" every time your media shows you any footage of \'OSAMA BIN-LADEN\' any time between 1997 & 2003... As for the times outside of this I-can\'t give the sort of 100% guarantee that such a serious subject requires however let-me say this again... The \'SAUDI-BORN OSAMA\' was quietly assassinated by CIA in the mid-eighties & he-was replaced by a blackmailed (Pedophile Snuff-Movies) & totally controlled pawn & puppet named \"PETER WILLIAM VANSTONE\" & apart from a two-inch height difference he-was a perfect look-alike to the original... Now think of all of the questions that \'FACT\' will raise & maybe you can see why for some time now I\'ve been urging your Congress to pass a South African Style \'TRUTH & RECONCILIATION AMNESTY BILL\' providing 100% \'FULL AMNESTY & NON-PROSECUTION\' for any who tell 100% of the truth as too just how much the total control of these \'WW2-Financiers\' who now totally run your country grew in power... It\'s very bloody scary & if you don\'t all start showing the exact same amount of courage you expected of your soldiers in Afghanistan & in Iraq then we are all stuffed & the insane plans & agendas of the Grade-A loonies running the show will all come to pass... (This includes a WW3 brought-on by a Nuclear Terror Strike to-be blamed on Muslim Terror) My facts are accurate balanced & checkable! Robby Daniel... Guest Write Comment
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4 Tags: Jacob G. Hornberger Obama Clinton |
||||||||