| Personal Declaration of Independence |
| MWC Corner | ||||||||
| By MWC News | ||||||||
|
Through my signature below I hereby withdraw my consent to be ruled by the organization that has called itself the Government of the United States of America. A government is empowered through the consent of the governed to serve a sacred purpose, namely, to create a bright and sustainable future for its people and a biodiverse garden of its region. This purpose is possible. If a government no longer serves its intended purpose then it is proper that each individual formally withdraw his or her consent to be ruled by that government. Through a consistent stream of actions the United States Government has proved itself to be corrupt, having turned away from serving its original purpose. The United States Government has therefore failed, and is de facto illegitimate. Consequently, all of its authorities over me are hereby removed and the United States Government is hereby disbanded in its entirety. All branches, the legislative, executive and judicial branches, including all offices and resources, political, military, security and financial, are hereby disenfranchised and replaced by local, self-organizing, bioregional governments and currencies that promote sustainable infrastructures and demonstrably serve the principles of integrity, transparency, interdependence, consciousness and the sustainable well being of their entire ecology. Human beings carry an inalienable responsibility for choosing to whom or what they pledge their allegiance. From this moment forward I no longer pledge my allegiance to the organization that has called itself the Government of the United States of America. We are dissociated. I disallow that organization to legislate, adjudicate, use money, or make agreements in my name, either nationally or internationally. I hereby withdraw my franchise from the United States Government and I no longer submit myself to its authority. I hereby abandon my United States Passport as worthless, null and void because through its own actions the United States Government has invalidated itself. This document recognizes that the United States Government has irredeemably abolished itself by no longer fulfilling its true purpose. This document announces that I take my authority back from that failed organization. The United States Government no longer has authority to represent me, tax me, detain me, question me, or in any way rule over me. It can no longer take any actions in my name. From this moment forward I take back my autonomy. I hereby declare my independence from the organization that has called itself the Government of the United States of America. Although I alone, without reason or circumstance, am responsible for my decision to withdraw my franchise and allegiance from the organization that has called itself the Government of the United States of America, I am willing to name examples of how this organization has betrayed the purpose for which it was originally created:
These and other actions reveal that the United States Government has irredeemably abolished itself by no longer fulfilling its original and true purpose.
Quote this article on your site | Views: 1228
1. 13-05-2008 02:08 If you are going to declare, at least sp Paragraph 4 about depleted uranium contains the following errors - The Government over and over again, and still now is using illegal DU (Depleted Uranium) weapons and devices -- DU is not illegal; there are no DU weapons and devices - there are kinetic energy penetrator munitions; DU is more than likely not being used at present; the US does not face any foe with armored vehicle targets, it has not faced such a foe since 2003 but the anti-DU crusader drum just beats on despite there really being nothing happening - DU was not used over and over again; it was used to destroy tanks and armored vehicles in the Gulf War, in the Balkans and perhaps in Afghanistan (it was not used in any aerial bombing of Afghanistan, another of the perennial false drumbeats of the anti-DU crusade. The writer is a typical disciple of the crusaders; he just regurgitates without thought and has not got a clue what he is talking about in direct opposition to signed United Nations agreements, -- There are no agreements, let alone signed United Nations agreements that ban the use of DU - they do not ban any other bullet and DU is no more harmful nor any less harmful than any other bullet fired in war. degrading the United States of America to a renegade country, More nonsense, use of DU has not degraded the US in the eyes of the world; there fortunately are enough scientists in the world who understand that DU is just one form of a naturally occuring element in the Earth's crust, uranium. The writer in his political zeal fails to understand that there has been uranium on Earth since it was created and there always will be uranium on the Earth. It is in the writer's backyard, you the reader's backyard, in the writer's air and in you the reader's air along with water. It is present in extremely small amounts, but it is pretty much everywhere, including having been used to date 1000 year old ice from deep in the Antarctica ice. likely to have its leadership regime brought to war crimes trials and capitally punished. More nonsense - Iraq appears to be a blunder, but much of the world believed that Saddam Hussein's government had weapons of mass destruction and it had not accounted for their destruction. The writer should actually read the war crimes trials from WW-II -- I presume that they have not - when they do, they will understand what a war crime is and more importantly what it is not. Want to learn about DU, go to www.depletedcranium.com and see the dinner on the Fiesta Ware orange plate; then come to DUStory and follow some of the links to learn what real scientists from all over the world have to say about its being used in the Balkans and Kuwait and learn about radiation and uranium and what a real radiological accident does and how DU is child's play in comparison. Finally, visit the Files Section using the password and username in Message 57 and learn about the anti-DU crusaders like Doug Rokke or Leuren Moret, both of whom are con artists who love travelling around the world in style with your money! Write me DUStory-owner@yahoogroups.com Guest 2. 13-05-2008 07:08 re-Legal status in weapons In 1996 the International Court of Justice (ICJ) gave an advisory opinion on the "legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons".[22] This made it clear, in paragraphs 54, 55 and 56, that international law on poisonous weapons, – the Second Hague Declaration of 29 July 1899, Hague Convention IV of 18 October 1907 and the Geneva Protocol of 17 June 1925 – did not cover nuclear weapons, because their prime or exclusive use was not to poison or asphyxiate. This ICJ opinion was about nuclear weapons, but the sentence "The terms have been understood, in the practice of States, in their ordinary sense as covering weapons whose prime, or even exclusive, effect is to poison or asphyxiate," also removes depleted uranium weaponry from coverage by the same treaties as their primary use is not to poison or asphyxiate, but to destroy materiel and kill soldiers through kinetic energy. The Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities of the United Nations Human Rights Commission,[23] passed two motions[24] the first in 1996[25] and the second in 1997.[26] They listed weapons of mass destruction, or weapons with indiscriminate effect, or of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering and urged all states to curb the production and the spread of such weapons. Included in the list was weaponry containing depleted uranium. The committee authorized a working paper, in the context of human rights and humanitarian norms, of the weapons. The requested UN working paper was delivered in 2002[27] by Y.K.J. Yeung Sik Yuen in accordance with Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights resolution 2001/36. He argues that the use of DU in weapons, along with the other weapons listed by the SubCommission, may breach one or more of the following treaties: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights; the Charter of the United Nations; the Genocide Convention; the United Nations Convention Against Torture; the Geneva Conventions including Protocol I; the Convention on Conventional Weapons of 1980; and the Chemical Weapons Convention. Yeung Sik Yuen writes in Paragraph 133 under the title "Legal compliance of weapons containing DU as a new weapon": Guest 3. 14-05-2008 00:04 DUStory - Links to Various International Depleted Uranium is not a nuclear weapon, nor is it a chemical weapon. It is a bullet; that's all. It does not even explode. This evening, I found that Southern Iraq actually has been surveyed by a UNEP team; I was surprised to see with the murder of the UN mission before they even captured Saddam Hussein that UNEP had done anything in Iraq let alone made a comprehensive DU survey in Basra and other southern Iraq cities and areas. The link is in the DUStories links section - it has not yet been placed in a message that anyone can read without joining that Yahoo group. The UN also has a Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission and they issued a lengthy report. The word "uranium" does not appear in that report. DU has been found to not be a hazard to the environment or the public in Boznia-Herzegovina by UNEP after extensive international field and laboratory research; Kuwait by IAEA after similar extensive international research and in Southern Iraq by a UNEP trained Iraqi field team that had the samples analyzed at a Swiss lab. Uranium natural levels in Afghanistan are also recorded in a UNEP report. DU is really a non issue except on the net and in far left political circles. Bush had nothing to do with the development of DU kinetic energy penetrator munitions and once he committed US armored forces to battle, he could not expect them to face the fairly sophisticated Soviet Bloc tanks used by the Iraqi Army without their best weapon. I do welcome a link to the UN report because I expect it contains false information. There are substantial false comments - they even make the UNEP reports. They mention non-existent DU-tipped missiles fired by helicopters, so even they, who did good solid science with the field sampling and laboratory anlysis have been led astray by the massive amount of deliberate misinformation on the net. Write me, I will write back DUStory-owner@yahoogroups.com Guest 4. 14-05-2008 09:22 let me repost this for you The Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities of the United Nations Human Rights Commission, passed two motions the first in 1996 and the second in 1997.They listed weapons of mass destruction, or weapons with indiscriminate effect, or of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering and urged all states to curb the production and the spread of such weapons. Included in the list was weaponry containing depleted uranium. Guest Write Comment
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4 Tags: Clinton Callahan United States of America Declaration of Independence |
||||||||