Translation
Bush’s Rebuke in Beijing
by Jacob G. Hornberger
While criticizing Chinese authorities for lack of religious and political freedom, President Bush was caught flat-footed by the rebuke issued by Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang, who responded, “We firmly oppose any words or acts that interfere in other countries’ internal affairs, using human rights and religion and other issues.”
What could Bush say? Here was a Chinese communist essentially enunciating the founding foreign policy of the United States of America, leaving Bush speechless on the issue.
Bush couldn’t say “I agree — it is wrong to interfere in the affairs of other countries” because he knew that the Chinese would simply point out that he was lying. After all, meddling in the internal affairs of other countries is the primary mission of U.S. foreign policy. That’s what the invasion of Iraq was all about, along with the indefinite occupation of the country. It’s what CIA and Pentagon assassinations, coups, foreign aid, regime change, and other such things are all about—interfering in the internal affairs of other countries.
Bush also couldn’t say, “I disagree—it is right and proper to interfere in the affairs of other countries” because that would have opened the door to the Chinese officials’ asking Bush to abandon the U.S. government’s commitment to torture, sex abuse, kidnapping, warrantless searches, illegally spying on Americans, waging wars of aggression, the enemy-combatant doctrine, rendition, kangaroo tribunals, and denial of due process of law.
It is both interesting and revealing that Bush chose to criticize the Chinese on religious and political liberty rather than on economic liberty. Undoubtedly, the reason is that Bush and his conservative cohorts, along with American liberals, share the same socialist and paternalist philosophy and programs that the Chinese communists embrace — e.g., Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, public (i.e., government) schooling, income taxation, occupational licensure, economic regulation, paper money, central banking (i.e., Federal Reserve), gun control, drug laws, trade restrictions, and immigration controls.
Despite China’s massive socialistic welfare state, economic activity continues to soar, unlike here in the United States. Part of the reason for this is that not only does the U.S. government have the burden of financing its enormous welfare state, it also has the burden of financing its imperial warfare state — i.e., troops in more than 100 countries, the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, and military bases all across the United States.
The principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries is a sound one, which is why our American ancestors embraced it. What a shame that it has to be enunciated by Chinese communists to a U.S. president who believes otherwise.
Quote this article on your site | Views: 1098Comments (1) |  |
Very clever trying to create an image of the US as some kind bleeding heart liberal/social country.
There are many capitalist countries in the world with excellent social/medical systems, and I bet you know that!
I have to pay a Medicare levy in my tax, even though I can afford the best of medical insurance, I am happy to do so as it helps those less fortunate than I,(a concept it appears is lost on the average US citizen). Most people in Australia accept Medicare as part of the social fabric.
In the US 25% of the population have no medical insurance, whereas it is 0% in Australia.
The citizens of this Land, are not subjected to 19th century propaganda that teaches its citizens callous indifference.
The reason why the US is a social dinosaur, compared to most First World Countries, is that they don\'t wast their resources on illegal/immoral wars of empire spreading, (thus they can afford a social system).
Heath care is a corporate racket in the US, and I bet you know that too.
Get real mate!
Mike
|
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4
Tags: Jacob G. Hornberger Social Security Medicare Medicaid Bush’s Rebuke Beijing