| Defeating the IDF |
| By Liaquat Ali Khan | ||||||
|
Special Features, The War Crime Machine
The war with Hezbollah is exposing the IDF's distinct weaknesses that undermine its status as an unconquerable military. The IDF is failing in its intelligence, targets, tactics, and strategies. The proof of the failure is in the indiscriminate destruction scattered on the ground. The crime scene, as they say, tells the story. Since the IDF is well-connected with the United States, its military supplies are unlikely to dwindle in the near future. In the Lebanon war, however, the IDF has destroyed dozens of buildings and killed hundreds of civilians but achieved nothing of strategic importance. The Hezbollah rockets continue to fall on Haifa. The IDF seems helpless to stop them.
The Hezbollah initiative, even if it is flattened in due time, would encourage the proliferation of other guerilla groups in the region to engage the IDF at other points on the long and seamless Israeli-Arab border. At the present time, no guerilla groups have surfaced in Jordan, Egypt, and Syria ready to engage the IDF across the border. This will change, as new groups draw enraged inspiration from the cages of Palestine and the ruins of Lebanon. And if Iran or Syria is attacked, the guerilla movement would find its quickening impetus. The suppressive measures that Arab national armies have so far imposed on guerilla groups would be removed since the public opinion, the so-called Arab street, would not allow national armies to crush homegrown groups challenging the IDF. The ambiguous but strategically lethal entente between Hezbollah and the Lebanese government would be writ large in the entire Middle East. It would serve as the future model for engaging the IDF.
The IDF knows that the stakes are high. That is why Israel has persuaded the US to block any attempts to halt fighting for a while. Ironically, however, even the Hezbollah is in no rush to beg for a ceasefire, since a long war benefits guerillas and not the IDF. In quick punches, the IDF plans on annihilating the Hezbollah. It wants to do in Lebanon what the US forces could not do Iraq. The IDF wants a big victory. The annihilation of Hezbollah must be so visible, believes the IDF, that the entire world could see the fate of "terrorists." If the war continues, the IDF is likely to intensify its bombardment and the attendant destruction in both Gaza and Lebanon. If the war stops, the emboldened Hezbollah would become even stronger in the years to come. Meanwhile, the IDF's strategy of total incineration of "terrorists" is creating public outcry throughout the world. For years, commentators, journalists, lawyers, and politicians have advanced the argument that terrorists are morally worthless because they kill innocent civilians. On the basis of this argument, a universal call is made to wipe out all terrorists. This argument is now pointing toward the IDF. The merciless killings of civilians in Gaza and Lebanon, the extensive annihilation of utility plants, apartment buildings, roads, and the bombardment of stand alone UN posts, all these reckless and confused military undertakings have forced the viewers across the world to draw parallels between terrorists and the IDF. Even the label of anti-Semitism has not prevented UN Emergency Relief Coordinator Jan Egland, who has previously served as the Secretary General of the Norwegian Red Cross, from saying that the IDF is violating the laws of war, i.e., the IDF has committed war crimes. Ali Khan is a professor of law at Washburn University School of Law in Topeka, Kansas. He can be reached at: ali.khan@washburn.edu Quote this article on your site | Views: 3317
1. 31-07-2006 13:08 "Ya' know - if the Arab nations spent half their time working for peace and the other half trying to make a better life for their people, instead of plotting how to destroy Israel, the Middle East would be a paradise." It has not been paradise in 2000+ years, I very seriously doubt that it will be even close to paradise in the near future. For as long as they (arabs and non arabs) keep the notion that it was the birth place of a 'GOD'. They'll be fighting for the right to own that very same 'GOD'. Which in a sense is kind of funny if you ask me. Guest 2. 31-07-2006 13:09 ru ru - gotta agree with you - but, since Israel was formed, the various Arab nations have been the aggressor, with the use of sicide bombs, etc. - I feel that Israel is just basically defending itself - they take so much, then just say "enough" and respond with heavy force. I think that if the Arab nations were to sincerely offer peace, Israel would happily go along with it. Guest 3. 31-07-2006 13:11 ru I think Israel has attempted to appease the other side for too long. They continue to give in , move their people and what happens? They still get attacked. Personally, I'm not sure there will ever be peace in the region, but I don't consider Israel the aggressor in this, they are defending themselves once again and making a stand for their people. Guest 4. 31-07-2006 13:12 ru Only the morally obtuse?or perverse?cannot recognize the difference between a terrorist group that targets civilian population centers with anti-personnel weapons designed to maximize civilian casualties and a democracy that seeks to prevent terrorism by employing smart bombs designed to minimize civilian casualties. [UN Secretary General Kofi] Annan knows better than to suggest a moral equivalence. He is fully aware of the tactic employed by terrorists of launching their rockets from, and hiding behind, civilian shields, so as to make democracies have to kill some civilians to get at the terrorists... [E]ven worse than the one-sided condemnations that ignore Hezbollah and Hamas are the numerous statements that perversely suggest moral equivalence. The UN peacekeepers on the Lebanese border have turned out to be collaborators with Hezbollah, videotaping the Hezbollah kidnapping of three Israeli soldiers in 2000 and then refusing to release the video?which could have helped in the rescue?on the grounds that it might compromise their 'neutrality.' This is a real test for the UN. If it cannot?or will not?distinguish between terrorists who target civilians and a democracy that seeks to stop the terrorism while minimizing civilian casualties, it has become part of the problem, rather than part of the solution." ?Alan Dershowitz Guest 5. 05-08-2006 03:46 ru Only a morally obtuse and perverse person or nation would not equate the killing and destruction that Israel has placed upon innocent people as WRONG and Criminal. War never begets peace. "Democracy" in the case of Israel appears to be only in name, not in practice.... How can one say that "one is terrorist because they are firing rockets" but the other "because it is firing video arcade 'surgical strikes' that are killing hundreds of innocent children is morally right"???? Anyone, with any sense, can see that Israel is JUST AS WRONG AS HEZBOLLAH in this case.. Dr. Lori Walton Guest Write Comment
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4 Tags: Ali Khan Defeating the IDF L. Ali Khan Liaquat Ali Khan |
||||||