A former Bangladeshi opposition politician, Ghulam Azam, is on trial for crimes against humanity committed more than 40 years ago.
The 89-year-old Azam cannot walk, cannot see, nor can he really hear. Yet he has 10 armed police officers watching him at all times.
The country's war crimes tribunal believes he collaborated with Pakistan's army, orchestrating mass killings during Bangladesh's 1971 war of independence from Pakistan.
Officials say three million people died in the nine-month-long conflict.
Sheikh Hasina Wajed, the Bangladeshi prime minister, has made the prosecution of war criminals part of her election manifesto. Her government is determined to fulfil its pledge.
A recent hearing by the UN working group on arbitrary detentions concluded the detention of Azam and others as arbitrary and in breach of international law.
However, Shaufiq Ahmed, the Bangladesh law minister, rejects the accusation. "This tribunal is not an international war crimes tribunal, this is a domestic tribunal," he said.
"Those who have been arrested are facing trial, so it's not an illegal detention."
If found guilty Azam will face the death penalty. Whatever the decision the court comes to, it will have dramatic consequences. It may bring justice to many but at the cost of throwing Bangladesh into further political instability.
|< Prev||Next >|
Most Read News
- Several wounded in Ohio State University attack
- Alwaleed bin Talal: 'Time for women to drive'
- US authorities: Dakota pipeline protesters can stay
- Oil prices surge as OPEC reaches production deal
- US: Air strikes killing dozens of Syrian troops legal
- 'Israeli jets' strike outside Damascus, no casualties
- UN: Rohingya may be enduring 'crimes against humanity'
- Bangladesh refuses Rohingya fleeing 'ethnic cleansing'
- Rohingya Muslims flee Myanmar crackdown to Bangladesh
- Dozens arrested for attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh
- Developing storm threatens Myanmar, Bangladesh
- Attack kills Myanmar police on Bangladesh border
Should US President-elect Donald Trump's opponents be protesting against the election result?