The biggest Dutch opposition parties have said they would not back the prime minister's budget cuts, deepening a political crisis after the government lost the support of its main ally and collapsed.
"I understand that you have to bring finances in order but you cannot cut rigorously because it hurts the economy and people. Three per cent is not feasible," Emile Roemer, Socialist leader, said in parliament on Tuesday.
The country was thrown into political turmoil on Monday when the government tendered its resignation following an abrupt split with Geert Wilders' populist Freedom Party.
The Netherlands must show how it will meet the European Union's deficit limit or it risks creating new turmoil in
financial markets. It must also pick a date for new elections, the fifth in ten years.
The eurozone's fifth-largest economy has been a haven of stability during the regional debt crisis and the officials criticised countries struggling to get their budgets in order.
But there is growing resistance to austerity in Europe and some economists are questioning whether drastic spending cuts will help the region get back on its feet.
Several opposition leaders rejected Prime Minister Mark Rutte's appeal for help in getting his $18 to 20bn savings package through.
It was not clear exactly why the Freedom Party, which backed the government for the past 18 months, suddenly withdrew its support. Wilders said he was fed up with Brussels' demands.
"We don't want to cut spending by $18.4bn and at the same time transfer billions of dollars to Brussels for the horrible ESM emergency fund and the weak Greeks," Wilders said.
The Dutch media have characterised Wilders as irresponsible with one cartoonist depicting him as a toddler in diapers playing with matches and setting the country on fire.
The Netherlands must bring its deficit to 3 per cent of gross domestic product, the EU's limit, next year but it is forecast to be 4.6 per cent unless extra cuts are made.
Rutte said the package had been pretty much stitched up by Friday night to produce a budget deficit of 2.8 per cent of GDP and that would have left about a billion dollars of wiggle room to address Wilders' concerns about weaker purchasing power.
He said Wilders changed his mind overnight and the deal was off by Saturday.
Some opposition parties argued that the Netherlands could be given more time to achieve the budget deficit goal.
But Rutte said he must send his plans to Brussels by April 30 and that the Netherlands was unlikely to be allowed extra time to meet the goal, or be shown any leniency.
Rutte must also try to agree an election date with other political parties. Some are pushing for one as soon as June while most have said September is the earliest possible.
A poll at the weekend showed that many Dutch are fed up with their politicians.
The crisis has also attracted the attention of credit ratings agency Moody's which said on Monday the government crisis was a negative factor for the country's credit but maintained its AAA rating with a stable outlook.
But it said if the country weakened its commitment to fiscal discipline, the rating could face downward pressure.
"This development is clearly credit-negative for the Dutch sovereign given that it generates both political and policy uncertainty," Moody's analysts wrote.
"Having said that, the Netherlands is entering this testing period from a position of relative strength."
|< Prev||Next >|
Most Read News
- Egypt court 'voids' Red Sea islands' transfer to Saudi
- Colombia and FARC sign historic ceasefire deal
- German police shoot dead hostage taker in cinema
- Dozens of pro-government fighters killed in Libya clash
- China to launch cruises to Spratly Islands: reports
- Report: 2015 was deadliest for environmental activism
- Dutch, French far-right parties call for EU referenda
- Dutch firmly reject EU-Ukraine ties in referendum
- Dutch Ukraine referendum tests strength of anti-EU mood
- UN court acquits Serbian nationalist politician Seselj
- FBI tipped off Dutch on Brussels attackers
- Johan Cruyff, Dutch football icon, dies at 68
|William John Cox|