Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Politic arrow Ron Paul on National Intelligence Report
Dec 12 2007
Ron Paul on National Intelligence Report | Print |  E-mail
Political Views
By MWC NEWS   

Translation

Bombed if you do, Bombed if you Don't
By Ron Paul

Carlos Latuff/ MWC NEWS
Carlos Latuff/ MWC NEWS

The latest National Intelligence Estimate has been greeted by a mixture of relief and alarm.  As I have been saying all along, Iran indeed poses no quantifiable imminent nuclear threat to us or her neighbors.  It is with much alarm, however, that we see the administration continue to ratchet up the war rhetoric as if nothing has changed.

Indeed nothing has changed from the administration's perspective, as they have had this latest intelligence report for some time.  Only this week has it been made known to the public.  They want it both ways with Iran. On the one hand, they discredit the report entirely, despite it being one of the most comprehensive intelligence reports on the subject, with over 1,000 source notes in the document.  On the other hand, when discrediting it fails, they claim that the timing of the abandonment of the weapons program, just as we were invading Iraq, means our pressure must have worked, so we must keep it up with a new round of even tougher sanctions. Russia and China are not buying this, apparently, and again we are finding ourselves on a lonely tenuous platform on the world stage.

The truth is Iran is being asked to do the logically impossible feat of proving a negative.  They are being presumed guilty until proven innocent because there is no evidence with which to indict them.  There is still no evidence that Iran, a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, has ever violated the treaty's terms – and the terms clearly state that Iran is allowed to pursue nuclear energy for peaceful, civilian energy needs.  The United States cannot unilaterally change the terms of the treaty, and it is unfair and unwise diplomatically to impose sanctions for no legitimate reason.

Are we to think that Iran hasn't noticed the duplicitous treatment being received by so-called nuclear threats around the globe?  If they have been paying attention, and I think they have, they would see that if countries do have a nuclear weapon, they tend to be left alone, or possibly get a subsidy, but if they do not gain such a weapon then we threaten them.  Why wouldn't they want to pursue a nuclear weapon if that is our current foreign policy?  The fact remains, there is no evidence they actually have one, or could have one any time soon, even if they immediately resumed a weapons program.

Our badly misguided foreign policy has already driven this country's economy to the brink of bankruptcy with one war based on misinformation.  It is unthinkable that despite lack of any evidence of a threat, some are still charging headstrong into yet another war in the Middle East when what we ought to be doing is coming home from Iraq, coming home from Korea, coming home from Germany and defending our own soil.  We do not need to be interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and waging war when honest trade, friendship, and diplomacy are the true paths to peace and prosperity.

This_Category
Category:: Political Views

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1053

Comments (4)
RSS comments
1. 12-12-2007 21:45
The Private Agenda
You gave an excellent summary of state-to-state relations between the U.S. and Iran. Unfortunately, there is a private agenda in Washington that also plays into U.S. policy: in a word, politicians' private agends. 
 
The danger of an unjustified and inexcusable war with Iran remains great because there are many reasons why Washington needs to bomb Iran. 
 
Washington culture is a "blame culture," so…the looming U.S. defeat in Iraq must be someone else’s fault, and we are certainly not going to blame those close friends of the Bush family, the royal family of Saudi Arabia no matter how many Saudis join the insurgents.  
 
The Bush-Cheney administration has failed: the world has been alienated, bin Laden has escaped and al Qua'ida metastasized, Afghanistan wobbles on the edge of collapse (except for its historic boom in narcotics exports), Russia and China are strengthening strategic ties, Russia is emerging again as a world oil power, Latin American populist reform movements are regaining both influence and an anti-U.S. hue. But—given the amazingly short memory of the American public—a good war will cover all this up. 
 
And then there are the two main reasons we attacked Iraq in the first place… 
 
Giving the Mideast to Israel. If the goal is to make Israel the Mideast superpower, destroying Saddam was but the first step toward that goal. Tehran is no more willing to kowtow to Israel than Baghdad was. Whether this plan to make Israel America's regional superpower will actually enhance the security or strengthen the democracy of the Israeli people is not being thought through at all. 
 
How else can Big Oil gain control of global oil supplies? Iran is a potential regional power, and one that stands steadfastly in the road of the neo-con imperial vision. 
 
 
 
nullnull
wmills@rcn.comNOSPAM! ">William deB. Mills
2. 17-12-2007 05:54
The Private Agenda
Both the article and nullnull's letter flesh out the sanest understanding of what 'America' is up to. Ron Paul, you and Kuchinick (sp?) are the only candidates worth listening to. You are a very courageous man who I fundamentally disagree with on a few issues, but your heart is in the right place. Thanks
Emily
3. 22-12-2007 00:54
The Private Agenda
I see you seem to like the cartoons drawn by Carlos Latuff... 
 
The same Latuff that defames, ridicules and disrespects US military forces, currently in a fighting war, by depicting them as rapists, blood thirsty murderers and criminal actors slaughtering innocent civilians in Bush's name. 
 
And spreads that crap all over the middle east...therefore endangering US troops even more. 
 
You, sir, are disgusting. How dare you.  
 
The day you disrespect my bretheren with such tripe is the first day of the rest of your life that this veteran spits on your campaign and refuses to waste anymore time considering you for ANY political position this nation may have. 
 
You won't empty my trash. 
 
US Navy (Retired)
12kiki@sbcglobal.netNOSPAM! ">Gary Banks
4. 22-12-2007 01:45
re
This cartoon has been chosen by MWC and has nothing to do with Dr. Paul.  
 
We choose what we feel is appropriate to illustrate the message to our readers.
Shahram

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Ron Paul US Intelligence
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Enter Amount: