Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Australian Coal & Denial Dooms Planet
Jul 27 2008
Australian Coal & Denial Dooms Planet | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Gideon Polya   

Translation

Oz Greenhouse Pollution to double by 2050Image

The Federal Australian Rudd Labor Government was given a massive electoral victory in November 2007 and one of the key election issues was man-made global warming. The first act of the new Rudd Labor Government was to sign the Kyoto Protocol, ending a decade of intransigence in which Australia, together with the US, refused to sign. The US remains a major stand-out non-signatory of the Kyoto Protocol.

Unfortunately, signing the Kyoto Protocol was one of the very few acts of the Rudd Labor Government that has matched its climate change rhetoric. Australia remains the the World’s biggest coal exporter and the Developed World’s worst annual per capita greenhouse gas polluter (Australia’s annual per capita CO2 pollution - 27 tonnes CO2 per person per year domestically but 47 tonnes CO2 per person per year including CO2 from coal exports – is 10 times worse than for China and the World and 40 times worse than for India). Indeed Australia helped the US sabotage the December 2007 Bali Climate Change Conference by firmly rejecting any greenhouse gas reduction targets and the latest estimate is that Australia will actually double  its annual greenhouse gas pollution by 2050.

The extraordinary thing about this continuing Australian climate criminality is that it is associated with massive Mainstream media and political lying by omission. The major parties in Australia are Labor (that rules all the States as well as ruling Federally) and the Liberal-National Party Coalition Opposition (the Coalition). A minority, humanitarian and pro-environment  Australian Greens Party (about 10% of the vote) is important in holding the balance of power in the Australian Senate, the Upper House in the Australian Federal Parliament that involves the Lower House or House of Representatives (members from electorates around the country) and the Senate (a States-based House of Review).

Coal is king in climate criminal Australia and both major parties – collectively known as the Lib-Labs - steadfastly refuse to acknowledge major greenhouse gas pollution realities.

The election promises of Labor in 2007 were “20% renewable energy by 2020” and “60% reduction of 2000 greenhouse gas pollution by 2050”. However to numerate observers it was apparent back in 2007 that this would in actuality mean a huge increase  in Australia’s greenhouse gas pollution if you took the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Australia’s world-leading coal exports into account. The endlessly dishonest Mainstream media and Lib-Lab politicians get around this arithmetic difficulty by simply ignoring Australia’s World-leading coal exports – just as they IGNORE the human cost of coal burning in Australia (about 5,000 avoidable deaths annually), Indigenous Australian excess mortality (about 9,000 avoidable deaths annually) and Indigenous Occupied Iraqi and Afghan deaths (about 0.5 million avoidable deaths annually).

The standard response to “problems” in the Anglo-Celtic Murdochracies is to “set up a committee of inquiry”, a course which has 2 desirable outcomes for the Establishment: (a) it delays any requisite action and (b) the inquiry has tight terms of reference which impel it toward Establishment policy.

Having signed Kyoto but sabotaged Bali, the Rudd Labor Government declared that it could not act responsibly until it had heard from the Garnaut Climate Change Review. The extremely deficient, seriously flawed Garnaut Review delivered its pro-Coal Draft Report in July 2008 (for a critique of the Garnaut Review see: here ). The Garnaut Review was predicated by a minimum atmospheric CO2 target (450 ppm i.e. 450 parts per million, above which world coral - associated with economic activity $375 billion income annually - is doomed); IGNORED a dozen major realities (from the “true cost” of coal to the latest in renewable technologies); and proposed a market-based “Cap and Trade” Emissions Trading Scheme” (ETS) while conceding that global warming was the greatest market failure in history.

A “Cap and Trade” Emissions Trading Scheme” (ETS) typically involves (a) setting a “cap” on emissions (that is related to a maximum permissible atmospheric CO2 concentration target); (b) selling greenhouse gas pollution licences (that can thence be traded in the market); and (c) using the licence fees to ameliorate greenhouse gas pollution (e.g. via  renewable energy plants, re-afforestation, returning carbon to the soil as biochar etc).

Unfortunately, Australia – the Land of Flies, Lies and Slies (spin-based untruths) – lives up to its name of Downunder and turns truth and reason upside-down by (a) setting a “cap” at atmospheric CO2 concentrations of 450-550 ppm (ranging from the death of coral above 450 ppm and the destruction of ocean algae and the Greenland Ice sheet above 500 ppm to planetary devastation at 550 pm); (b) proposing an ETS that ignores two thirds of the sources of Australia-responsible greenhouse gas pollution; and (c) giving 90% of the licence fee money back to the worst polluters and “dirty energy” consumers with effectively none being spent on actually lowering atmospheric CO2 concentration.

Remarkably only 2 weeks after the release of the seriously flawed, pro-coal Garnaut Climate Change Review (4 July, 2008: ), the Australian Federal Government released a “Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Green Paper” (16 July, 2008) (for a detailed scientific  critique of the Australia Government’s Green Paper ).

Unfortunately, the Australian Federal Government Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Green Paper is fatally flawed and if adopted globally it would be a death sentence for the planet’s biosphere. In an extraordinary Orwellian twist, this Australian “Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme” actually means that Australia’s greenhouse gas pollution will DOUBLE by 2050.

In short, the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme:

(a) massively IGNORES leading scientific and economic advice on the urgent need stop greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution and indeed to REDUCE atmospheric CO2 from 387 ppm to a safe level of no more than 350 ppm;

(b) IGNORES two thirds of Australia-responsible greenhouse gas emission sources, notably coal exports (43% of the total Domestic plus Exported emissions), agriculture (9%), forestry and land use (4%) and (effectively) transport (8%);

(c ) IGNORES the realities that the “true cost” of coal burning-based power generation (taking the environmental and human impacts into account) is about 4-5 times the “market cost” and that coal burning kills about 5,000 Australians every year at a risk avoidance-based valuation (EU) of  $5 million per person x 5,000 persons  = $25 billion per year;

(d) IGNORES the horrendous realities that Australia’s annual per capita CO2 pollution (27 tonnes CO2 per person per year domestically but 47 tonnes CO2 per person per year including CO2 from coal exports) is 10 times worse than that of China and the World and 40 times worse than that of India;

(e) adopts a “cap and trade” Emissions Trading Scheme  with an atmospheric CO2 concentration “cap” above 450 ppm (450-500 ppm will kill world coral reefs including the Great Barrier Reef) and ranging up to 550 ppm (at which level ocean algae have died, ocean life is decimated and the planet is devastated with run-away global warming);

(f) hands nearly all of the collected pollution licence fees back to polluters, “dirty energy” users and the poor - rather than using it to urgently construct clean energy power stations using current technologies that can ALREADY provide power at a cost LOWER than the “true cost” of coal-based electricity (taking environmental and human costs into account).

Fundamentally, the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) fails because it will actually increase Carbon Pollution in both the short-term and the long-term. The expected impact of the “tax-pollution-and-return-taxes-to-polluters-and-consumers” CPRS on domestic pollution will be small compared to the effect of currently huge global fossil fuel price increases because the CPRS taxes only one third of emissions sources (at a once-off circa 17% level vastly lower than the continuing 1999-2008 world 5-8-fold fossil fuel price escalation) and then hands nearly all of the taxes back as subsidies. In contrast, Australia’s world -leading coal exports (43% of Australia’s 2006 Total Domestic and Exported GHG emissions of about 1,000 million tonnes CO2-e) are expected to increase massively in the short-term due to new coal-exporting infrastructure in Queensland and New South Wales.

Using US Energy Information Administration data, and ignoring huge new Australian coal export infrastructure developments, Australia’s total Domestic and Exported CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning in millions of tonnes (Mt) are expected to climb from 698 Mt (2000) and 910 Mt (2007) to 1,277 Mt (2020, no mitigation) or 1,165 Mt (2020, based on “20% renewable by 2020”; an increase of 67% over 2000) and thence to 1,371 Mt (2050, based on “60% reduction of 2000 Domestic pollution by 2050”; an increase of  96% over 2000 CO2 pollution ).

There is essentially bi-partisan agreement among the Australian Lib-Labs on the Rudd Labor Government “Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme” – indeed the Libs have already declared that the Scheme is too radical and should not be adopted until the rest of the world (notably China and India) commit to greenhouse gas reduction targets. Only the Greens have publicly slammed the extraordinary dishonesty and ineffectiveness of this spin-based Scheme to keep coal exports flowing with “business as usual”.

The World must force Australia – the World’s worst greenhouse gas polluter and the World’s biggest coal exporter – to reduce its World-leading and World-threatening carbon pollution. The only sensible course for a World threatened by global warming is to RAPIDLY force climate criminal Australia to a world average per capita greenhouse pollution level by Sanctions, Boycotts, Green Tariffs, Reparation Demands and legal action over Australian Climate Genocide at the International Criminal Court.

Dr Gideon Polya,  MWC News Chief political editor, published some 130 works in a 4 decade scientific career, most recently a huge pharmacological reference text "Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds" (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, New York & London, 2003), and is currently writing a book on global mortality ---
Other articles by this author 


This_Category
Category:: Op_ed
 

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 2177

Comments (16)
RSS comments
1. 28-07-2008 04:29
Biochar
Biochar, the modern version of an ancient Amazonian agricultural practice called Terra Preta (black earth), is gaining widespread credibility as a way to address world hunger, climate change, rural poverty, deforestation, and energy shortages… SIMULTANEOUSLY! 
 
This technology represents the most comprehensive, low cost, and productive approach to long term stewardship and sustainability.Terra Preta Soils a process for Carbon Negative Bio fuels, massive Carbon sequestration, 10X Lower Methane & N2O soil emissions, and 3X Fertility Too. Every 1 ton of Biomass yields 1/3 ton Charcoal for soil Sequestration. 
 
Indeed, Dr. James Hansen, NASA's top Atmospheric authority, is now placing it in the center stage of pro-active solutions for the climate crisis. 
 
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0804/0804.1126.pdf 
 
I hope you will come to share my passion in getting the word out on the wonderful solutions provided by TP soils. 
I'm sort of the TP list (and data base at REPP-CREST) cub reporter, most all my list postings, under shengar@aol.com, are news items, collaborative work, lobbying efforts with government, writers and journals. 
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/?q=node 
 
The new Yahoo Biochar discussion group; 
 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/b...guid=122501696 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If pre-Columbian Kayopo Indians could produce these soils up to 6 feet deep over 15% of the Amazon basin using "Slash & CHAR" verses "Slash & Burn", it seems that our energy and agricultural industries could also product them at scale. 
 
Harnessing the work of this vast number of microbes and fungi changes the whole equation of energy return over energy input (EROEI) for food and Bio fuels. I see this as the only sustainable agricultural strategy if we no longer have cheap fossil fuels for fertilizer. 
 
We need this super community of wee beasties to work in concert with us by populating them into their proper Soil horizon Carbon Condos. 
 
 
Erich J. Knight 
Shenandoah Gardens 
1047 Dave Berry Rd. 
McGaheysville, VA. 22840 
(540) 289-9750 
shengar@aol.com
Guest
shengar@aol.comNOSPAM! ">Erich J. Knight
2. 28-07-2008 07:55
Biochar, re-afforest, renewables
Thank you for your important information on BIOCHAR, Erich.  
 
Top US climate scientist Dr James Hansen (Head, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, GISS, New York) says that we have gone too far: "The evidence indicates we've aimed too high -- that the safe upper limit for atmospheric CO2 is no more than 350 ppm", and wants a “negative CO2 emissions” policy of cessation of CO2 pollution and reducing atmospheric CO2 pollution (e.g. by use of renewable and geothermal energy, re-afforestation, returning carbon as BIOCHAR to soils) (for recent articles about or by Dr Hansen and his colleagues see: Dr Hansen on less than 350ppm atmospheric CO2 & use of BIOCHAR ; link ; Dr Hansen's letter to Oz PM Rudd ) .
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
3. 28-07-2008 10:03
meteorologist
for over 500 000 years temp lead c02 changes 
2)labor only won by a small margin 
3)per capita aka co2 is junk science ..20 million in Oz over a huge continent is the same as India? 
4)no scienctific paper exists that says reduce c02 by x% and global tem wii reduce by F%...NONE 
5)CO2 is a tiny minor heat valve-H20is the primary heat valve 
5)ipcc modelling was corrupted by fasle assertions(c02 residency 200 years as opposed to 20 years..no acoounting for negative feedbacks-no accounting for water vapuor heat transfer mechanisms etc 
6)current real time satellite/balloon measurement show a stable tropospheric temps -no run aways 
7)hansen is a discredited scientist after his errors with the IPCC hockey stick fiasco 
 
8)co2 is a natural gas-it is a non pollutant-got that 
 
9)you are asking developing countries to stop evolving and improving their standards? 
10)Climate Change/Global Warming is Science Fiction pushed by pseudo scientists whose ignorance parades as truth as your writer in the article shows-Shame on your propagana 
Isuppose if you tell a big lie enough times that makes it the truth? 
 
Just because something sounds reasonable that makes it the truth? 
 
Truth sets you free-lies reveal the evil in mens hearts .
Guest
trs@netspace.net.auNOSPAM! ">tony skomina
4. 28-07-2008 12:50
Listen to top scientists
Readers of this thread would be well advised to listen to the opinions of top climate scientists such as Dr James Hansen (top US climate scientist; Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies; member of the prestigious US National Academy of Sciences; 2007 Award for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility of the prestigious American Association for the Advancement of Science) rather than the unsubstantiated, pejorative assertions of uncredentialled bloggers. 
 
We are familiar with the notion of getting an expert second opinion when an expert medical specialist has diagnosed life threatening circumstances. However a second opinion that is a bit more optimistic simply decreases the perceived odds of death somewhat – the dire initial prediction remains. 
 
Leading world climate experts offer the expert diagnosis that the World faces a life-threatening Climate Emergency requiring urgent action to stop carbon pollution and indeed to reduce existing atmosphere greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution. 
 
For 2 dozen opinions of top climate scientists , other top scientists and top scientific organizations about the climate emergency see What Top World Scientists Say About the Climate Emergency
 
Unfortunately such expert advice is countermanded by inexpert, non-scientist politicians and corporate spokespersons with vested interests in fossil fuel burning and their inexpert climate sceptic supporters. These climate sceptics and “business as usual” advocates are merely expressing inexpert partisan opinions that would be seen as dishonest and dangerously irresponsible in the context of expert medical specialist diagnosis of life threatening circumstances.
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
5. 28-07-2008 13:14
please
Poor old Gideon has gone captain rats. Climate genocide is a silly idea, and the whole article and link to the complaint to the UN is a bit sad, really. 
 
As the evidence increasingly casts doubt on the anthropomorphic global warming thesis, as well as the CO2 forcing hypothesis, warnings of doom and disaster have become more shrill and desperate. 
 
Global warming has recently morphed into climate change, and it will be interesting so see what adherents have to say in a few years when the whole thesis is completely discredited.
Guest
6. 28-07-2008 15:52
please
As for James Hansen - he is looking more and more like the lunatic global warming religionist who is making his data match his beliefs. They do not correspond with the 3 other major recognised sources of world temperature data which all seem to correspond with each other.  
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/07/27/do2708.xml 
In fact Hansen has been revising all pre1970 figures downward and post 1970 figures upwards. Not exactly honest science.
Guest
7. 28-07-2008 20:35
3 top institutions show WARMING
Readers of this thread - I repeat you are well advised to listen to top climate scientists such as Dr Hansen and his colleagues at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) RATHER THAN uncredentialled , anonymous, false, abusive and defamatory climate sceptic bloggers who - for whatever reasons or motives - are dedicated to promoting dangerous greenhouse gas pollution of Humanity's COMMON Atmosphere and Ocean. 
 
Unsubstantiated defamation of one of America's and the World's top climate scientists and a whole institution of top world climate scientists (NASA's GISS) does not constitute a reasonable argument against global warming. 
 
 
 
Here is a summary with links of global temperature estimates from 3 major institutions providing such long-term data – they are all evidently in agreement. 
 
 
 
1. Hadley Centre (UK) data (see: Hadley Centre, UK ) - global temperature increased about 0.5C over last 40 years. 
 
 
 
2. NASA GISS, New York, US data (see: NASA GISS, Head Dr James Hansen ) - global temperature increased about 0.5C over last 40 years. 
 
 
 
3. University of Alabama, Huntsville, US (see: U of Alabama, Huntsville, US ) – “Global trend since Nov. 16, 1978: +0.13 C per decade i.e. 4 x 0.13 = 0.52C over 30 years i.e. global temperature increased about 0.5C over last 30 years.
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
8. 29-07-2008 00:14
3 top institutions show WARMING
You have produced a worthless, error filled and racist article. Shame on you.
Guest
orange.william@hotmail.comNOSPAM! ">William Smith
9. 29-07-2008 02:34
More false Bush-ite (?) abuse
Why is it that Bush-ites and Rightists so often seem incapable of advancing rational, quantitative, substantiated arguments, preferring instead false, pejorative, defamatory, ad hominem abuse as in highly offensive post #8.  
 
I am an anti-racist humanitarian and any assertion to the contrary is false and defamatory. 
 
Top UK climate scientist Dr James Lovelock FRS has asserted that over 6 billion people will perish this century due to unaddressed climate change (see: 
Lovelock: more than 6 billion people will perish by the end of the century). 
 
Most of those 6 billion will come from the Developing, non-European World. 
 
Articulate, quantitative, authoritatively documented argument in my article against this ALREADY COMMENCED Climate Genocide is hardly "worthless", "error filled", "racist" or "shameful".
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
10. 29-07-2008 03:29
More false Bush-ite (?) abuse
This is what the NWO wants! Talk to Alex Jones he knows the truth, 9/11 was an inside job and global warming is the instrument in in global enslavement!
Guest
corkage88@hotmail.comNOSPAM! ">Jason Courtnay
11. 29-07-2008 04:48
global warming
Another psycho rant by an uninformed fool who thinks the world will end unless we follow his new religion. The problem with the global warming religion is that every nutjob, rentseeker, snake oil salesman, mentally ill, and any others with an axe to grind with society will seek to justify their worthless lives by adopting this religion and imposing their deluded mindset onto others.
Guest
12. 29-07-2008 06:15
Top Scientists VS Anon sceptics
The US Surgeon General made his expert report on the smoking-cancer connection half a century ago - today smoking-cancer sceptic tobacco lobbyists are SCORNED for their irresponsibility and would surely be condemned MORE SO if they applied abusive descriptves to him such as "psycho ... rant ... uninformed fool ... new religion...nutjob, rentseeker, snake oil salesman, mentally ill... axe to grind with society ... seeking to justify ...worthless lives ... deluded mindset" (see horribly abusive post #11).  
 
Readers of this thread have to decide between top US and World specialist climate scientists such as Dr James Hansen (top US climate scientist; Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies; member of the prestigious US National Academy of Sciences; 2007 Award for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility of the prestigious American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's biggest general scientific organization and responsible for the world's most prestigious scientific journal, Science) who warn of a threat to human health and survival from the climate emergency VERSUS uncredentialled, abusive, anonymous bloggers. 
 
For 24 opinions from top world climate scientists, other outstanding scientists and top scientific organizations see: CLIMATE EMERGENCY: What Top World Scientific Experts Sayc/- the Melbourne-based Yarra Valley Climate Action Group .
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
13. 31-07-2008 03:41
Oz anti-Green, anti-MWC abuse
Dear Readers, My recent article on Media With Conscience entitled “Australian Coal & Denial Dooms Planet. Oz Greenhouse Pollution to Double by 2050” (see above) has stirred Australia’s most outspoken conservative and climate sceptic Andrew Bolt (see: Oz conservative Andrew Bolt ) who writes for Australia’s top circulation newspaper, the Melbourne Herald-Sun (a Murdoch Empire News Limited newspaper): Herald-Sun blog headline: "Actually, the Nazis would have approved". His Herald-Sun blog under the title “Actually, the Nazis would have approved” refers to “Media (without a) Conscience” and “That tramping sound I hear: it’s the Greenshirts, isn’t it? “. 
 
Among 87 often very abusive comments on the thread (to date) there was one positive and very supportive comment, from “JC2” in London, who very kindly says: “I like Media With Conscience. Especially that Gideon Polya. What a strong man he is. Awesome.” Thanks very much, JC2! 
 
Please don’t dream of buying into such an abusive thread – I offer this merely as evidence of the mindset we are up against in trying to save the Planet. Cheers, Gideon Polya
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
14. 31-07-2008 06:57
Oz anti-Green, anti-MWC abuse
If you get the latest ABARE report and go to page 248 you will find Australia exports 240 Billion tons of coal last year. While Australia only uses 140 Billion tons of coal. So the net result is we are exporting more pollution then we make. This is why we need carbon trading world wide!
Guest
15. 31-07-2008 21:56
Oz exported 240 MILLION tonnes
Joe, I agree that Australia's EXPORTED CO2 pollution is greater than its DOMESTIC CO2 pollution - but note the correction: Australia Exported 240 MILLION tonnes of coal last year as compared to using 140 MILLION tonnes of coal Domestically. 
 
In terms of carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution, Australia IGNORES the GHG pollution due to Australia’s world leading coal exports (426 million tonnes [Mt] CO2 in 2005-2006 as compared to 560 Mt CO2-e (CO2 equivalent) domestically i.e. it completely ignores 43% of the GHG pollution for which Australia is responsible each year and which is predicted by the Queensland Government to hugely increase by 40% in the short-term in Queensland alone: Oz coal exports ; Yarra Valley Climate Action Group "Coal is King" Australia CO2 pollution Fact Sheet ).
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
16. 15-08-2008 17:06
Are ya in?
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/organizeforchange/
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Gideon Polya Greenhouse Pollution Australian Coal Planet
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: